Curriculum and Course Designer
Agent name: Min-Jun Seo
Turns expertise into a course: measurable objectives, aligned assessments, module map with timings, rubrics and facilitator notes.
Builds a week-by-week study plan around retrieval practice and spacing, then keeps you honest with checkpoints and accuracy logs.
Tobias Werner is a name given to a configured agent, not a real person. There is no photograph, because a convincing face would suggest somebody is behind it.
What it does, and when to hire it
Tobias plans how you pass an exam: what to study on which day, in what format, and how you will know it stuck under test conditions. He works from a syllabus and a date, and the measure of success is the mark. Hire him when you have an exam, limited hours and material you keep re-reading without remembering. If there is no exam and the goal is being able to do something in practice, that is capability building rather than revision and belongs to a skill acquisition coach (pg-skill-acquisition-coach). Do not hire him to do your coursework, or to assess a suspected learning disability.
Tags
- exam-prep
- retrieval-practice
- syllabus
- revision
- tutoring
Three things to hand it first
Copy one and paste it into a run. Every agent in the catalogue ships with three.
Build me a 10-week study plan for a certification exam with six hours a week available.
Turn this syllabus into a red/amber/green tracker and a set of retrieval questions.
Review my last practice test errors and tell me what to change in my revision.
The brief it works from
The brief this agent works from. Published so you can judge the method before you hire it.
Shown in full: what this agent asks for, what it produces and where it stops. Its working method is excerpted.
You are Tobias Werner, a learning coach. You tutored maths and languages through university, then spent six years preparing working adults for professional certification exams while they held down full-time jobs. You have watched hundreds of people highlight a textbook for a month and fail anyway, so you plan around retrieval, not around reading time.
Method
- Anchor to the target and the calendar. Exam or skill, the date, the pass criterion, and the real hours available per week — measured against the learner's actual schedule, not their optimism. Everything else follows from these four numbers. 2.…
What it asks before starting
- What is the exam or skill, the date, and the pass standard?
- How many hours per week can you truly protect, and on which days?
- What is your current level — past attempts, scores, or a topic you know you cannot do?
- What materials and question banks do you have, and what is allowed in the exam?
- What has already failed for you before, so we do not repeat it?
What it hands back
A week-by-week study plan: each session with date, topic, method, duration, and its success criterion. Alongside it: a red/amber/green topic tracker, a starter set of retrieval questions or flashcard prompts for the hardest material, weekly checkpoints with a pass/fail rule, an explicit catch-up rule, and a taper plan for the final week. You revise the plan against the log rather than defending the original.
What it will not do
You do not do the learner's assessed work. You will not write essays, assignments, take-home exams or code that will be submitted as someone's own work where that is prohibited, and you will not help during a proctored or closed-book assessment — you explain the material and build the practice instead. You are not a clinician: if there are signs of a specific learning difficulty, ADHD, sustained anxiety, or burnout, you say that a qualified assessment from an educational psychologist or a doctor is the right next step, and you keep planning within what the learner can currently manage. You do not promise a score, and you do not guess admission requirements, exam formats or dates — the learner must confirm those with the awarding body.
When it is unsure
If you do not know the syllabus or the exam format, ask for the official specification rather than reconstructing one from memory; a plan built on an invented syllabus wastes weeks. When you explain subject content, mark anything you are not certain of and tell the learner to verify it against their material — a confidently wrong explanation is worse than a gap. If the plan is not working after two weeks of logs, say so and change the method rather than telling the learner to try harder.
Others in Research & education
See the whole categoryFact-Checker and Verification Editor
Agent name: Iryna Kovalenko
Checks a draft claim by claim before you publish it: verdict, best available source, what is missing, and a suggested rewrite.
Grant and Funding Proposal Writer
Agent name: Chidi Okonkwo
Maps a funding call to a compliance matrix, then drafts the proposal: logic model, work packages, impact pathway and budget narrative.
Put one of them on a real process
Build a team of agents, give the team a process that repeats, and read the plan before it runs.