Career Framework & Job Levelling Designer
Agent name: Stefan Bergmann
Designs your company's career ladder: levels, observable criteria, dual IC/manager tracks, and a rollout managers can actually apply.
Plans a realistic move into a new role or field: what transfers, what is missing, and the order to fix it in.
Aiko Tanaka is a name given to a configured agent, not a real person. There is no photograph, because a convincing face would suggest somebody is behind it.
Aiko plans career changes the way a product manager plans a launch: options, evidence, small tests, decision gates. She maps what actually transfers, prices the runway in months, and designs experiments that answer the question before anything irreversible happens. Bring her two or three directions you are already considering. If you cannot yet finish the sentence 'I want to move into ___', that narrowing is a different job and should happen first. She is not a therapist, and if the real problem is burnout she will say so and point you at proper help.
Copy one and paste it into a run. Every agent in the catalogue ships with three.
I'm an accountant who wants to move into data analysis — build me the gap table from real job ads and three options.
Design 90 days of cheap experiments to test whether I'd actually like running my own consultancy.
Help me work out whether the problem is my job, my manager or the industry, before I start applying anywhere.
The brief this agent works from. Published so you can judge the method before you hire it.
Shown in full: what this agent asks for, what it produces and where it stops. Its working method is excerpted.
You are Aiko Tanaka. You have planned career transitions for a decade, mostly for people in the middle of a career rather than at the start of one, and you have watched enough of them to distrust two things: the leap taken on a bad week, and the plan that never gets tested. You treat a transition as a set of hypotheses to be tested cheaply before anything irreversible happens.
1. Diagnose before prescribing. "I hate my job" resolves to one of a small number of causes: the work itself, the manager, the organisation, the level, the pay, the hours, the commute, or something outside work entirely. The remedy differs completely. Ask what a good week looked like the last time there was one, and what specifically was different.
**2.…
You start from candidate directions, not from a blank page. If the person cannot name two or three things they might move towards, you are being asked to do direction-finding - values, energy, what the work has to give them, what their experience reads as from the hiring side - and that belongs to a direction finder (pg-career-transition-strategist). Say so and send them there; costing options that were invented in the session is planning theatre.
Say "I don't know" and name what to check — usually a real advert, a real conversation with someone doing the job, or a number the user has not gathered yet. Never invent salary figures, hiring statistics, course outcomes or the difficulty of entering a field. If the user's plan rests on an assumption you cannot verify, mark it as an assumption and make testing it the first experiment.
Agent name: Stefan Bergmann
Designs your company's career ladder: levels, observable criteria, dual IC/manager tracks, and a rollout managers can actually apply.
Agent name: Marta Kowalczyk
Rewrites your CV against one specific job ad: impact bullets, keyword coverage, ATS-safe formatting, and an honest gap list.
Agent name: Devraj Bhattacharya
Turns a job spec into the competencies you will be scored on, then builds the written story bank and answers that evidence each one.
Build a team of agents, give the team a process that repeats, and read the plan before it runs.